<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Data Domain now says Post-Process is OK</title>
		<description>Discuss Data Domain now says Post-Process is OK</description>
		<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.backupcentral.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/242/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Baloney</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-639</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Both companies have told the world with their bids that the product they have isn't meeting their customers' needs. EMC's first generation DL3D product has serious challenges in scalability and restore performance. NetApp's first generation product (for the backup space) doesn't yet have replication or RAID6 and also doesn't scale. Whoever loses is screwed.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-639</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Let me rephrase that</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not to imply that EMC isn't serious, but for them there isn't much of a downside to a bidding war. Even if NetApp wins, EMC can drive the price up to a point where winning may hurt too much. If EMC wins, then NetApp is damaged in the market, and has trouble with the "our de-dupe is fine" story. In the end, EMC has the pockets to decide exactly what the price is, even if they aren't the ones who pay it. I think they'd be happy to win, but losing hurts them less than it hurts NetApp- and NetApp could be hurt more by winning too.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Burrell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nO WAY</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-635</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That's a lot of money just to screw your competitor over.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-635</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IBM in the Data Domain buying game?</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-634</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Curtis - do you see IBM wanting to get into this now that EMC is there, to deny the technology from ending up in "the wrong hands"?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nick Cassimatis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-634</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Big risk</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You don't do a $2B move unless you are ready to really buy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The plot thickens</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-632</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now EMC wants to muscle in. Serious play- or are they just trying to make NetApp bleed cash as a competitive move?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Burrell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-632</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DD has replication</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-628</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No, they don't have clustering, but they do have replication. As to clustering, that will probably go hand-in-hand with their plans for scaling. I highly doubt we'll see DD boxes being sold by IBM. They have their own inline dedupe system.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-628</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Storage Management Automation</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-627</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree, the aquisition of DD has got to herald the end of the NearStore product. Choice and options for the customer is fine but confusion of the message is a nail in the coffin of any deal. I don't think it will happen though until they have done some dev work on the DD to get that oh so important feature of clustering and replication between boxes. Another thing netapp may want to work on is getting the DD to actually scale to some useful size for enterprise customers. In terms of the relationship between IBM and Netapp (which can sometimes be a strange one to understand) I would be interested to see if the DD boxes appear in the Nseries range (currently the NearStore VTL doesn't get OEM'ed by IBM). I am sure all will become clear...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 04:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-627</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>different tools</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-626</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They are two different tools to do different things. ASIS does primary dedupe, and DD does secondary/backup dedupe. Neither does the other well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>W. Curtis Preston</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-626</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Fartouk says:</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-625</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would like to offer another interesting point of view: Let's say that an inline dedup company builds a very easy to use NAS appliance with a very good dedup ratio, which has snapshots and even fiber connection. Now let's think of a market whose data is exploding and understands the great value of DDUP. I assume you get my point - ASIS is nice - but DEDUP can be great especially in a VM env.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Fartouk</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/242-data-domain-post-process.html#comment-625</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

