<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Is Holographic Storage the future of archive & backup?</title>
		<description>Discuss Is Holographic Storage the future of archive & backup?</description>
		<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/384-holographic-storage.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.backupcentral.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/384.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>AustinLazanowski says:</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/384-holographic-storage.html#comment-1298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I could really see this coming in handy with some tier-5 archiving storage IF and only if the media itself has significantly longer stability than tape or disk media today. So when Joe Blow reads the file he'll only read once every 3 years, the stub file will point to a "disk" of these holographic storage media. At that point, I would assume that the cost would be less than keeping it on actively powered disk and still provided better random i/o than a tape.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AustinLazanowski</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.backupcentral.com/mr-backup-blog-mainmenu-47/13-mr-backup-blog/384-holographic-storage.html#comment-1298</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
