<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Joomla! powered Site</title>
		<description>Joomla! site syndication</description>
		<link>http://www.backupcentral.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:42:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		
		<item>
			<title>PBS does my shipmates proud!</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/content/view/171/47/</link>
			<description>This has nothing to do with backups, but I just finished watching the first episode of Carrier on PBS and I&amp;#39;m feeling proud... Click Read More to find out why. </description>
			<category>Curtis' Random Thoughts - Mr. Backup Blog</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Load-balanced tape drives?</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/content/view/170/47/</link>
			<description>I keep running into a particular problem at customers and I&amp;#39;m curious if any backup software products have addressed it.  Do any backup products load-balance their use of tape drives across multiple Fibre Channel ports?  Click Read more to see more details. </description>
			<category>Curtis' Random Thoughts - Mr. Backup Blog</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:01:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bad Mozy Review Makes No Sense</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/content/view/169/47/</link>
			<description>A CNET review of Mozy&amp;#39;s online backup software, entitled  Everyone likes Mozy, Except Me.  makes one or two good points, but IMHO misses the boat and makes no sense to me, a backup person.  If you want to know what he said and why I disagree with it, read on. </description>
			<category>Curtis' Random Thoughts - Mr. Backup Blog</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:49:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Quantum's Dedupe: Inline or not?</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/content/view/166/47/</link>
			<description> I kept reading stories like this one  (http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=145674) that said that Quantum&amp;#39;s dedupe is inline.  Then I would hear from those  in the know  that said it was post-process.  Different people at Quantum would say different things.  Some would say that they run the dedupe at the same time as the ingest, so they considered it inline, although data is hitting disk before it&amp;#39;s deduped.  They say since it only hits disk for a few seconds, it&amp;#39;s really inline.  I said,  No it&amp;#39;s not.   So what&amp;#39;s the scoop?  Read on to see. </description>
			<category>Curtis' Random Thoughts - Mr. Backup Blog</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:51:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Backup Central moved to a new server!</title>
			<link>http://www.backupcentral.com/content/view/168/47/</link>
			<description>BackupCentral moved to a new server today.  That was fun!  </description>
			<category>Curtis' Random Thoughts - Mr. Backup Blog</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:01:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
