tburrell
Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 40
|
+ 1 to appliance for you.
Your site sounds pretty much like one of our remote offices, where I am using Puredisk quite effectively. BUT... if it were my only location I would not go that route.
You mention that you are Windows only shop- Puredisk has to run on Linux, so unless you already have some in-house expertise, you're not going to find that as simple as a dedicated hardware solution.
I did a demo with DataDomain last year, and if I were in your shoes I would have recommended that. We just have too many tiny little offices to justify that number of appliances (heck, I don't see how we can justify half the servers!) so a source de-dupe like Puredisk makes the most sense, and we didn't want to implement 2 solutions so we are running it at some sites where an appliance would be fine just to keep life simple.
The upcoming Puredisk Disk Storage Unit would be OK, but again it only really makes sense if you are also trying to support multiple small remote sites.
Having worked with both Netbackup and BackupExec, I would go with Netbackup in your situation. Better use of your tape media, better D2D2T,
and you can treat it more as an appliance (by which I mean that in a simple environment, Netbackup will give you better autopilot performance than BE).
Tom
|