SearchFAQMemberlist Log in
Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
slightly OT: track following errors?
Author Message
Post slightly OT: track following errors? 
Greets,

at a customer I face problems writing to tape.

We used the cleaning tape and also tried new tapes.

It is a DAT72 by HP:

Vendor: HP Model: C7438A

We get stuff like:

st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
st0: Sense Key : 0x4 [current]
Info fld=0x2f662
st0: ASC=0x9 ASCQ=0x0
st0: Sense Key : 0x4 [current]
Info fld=0x2a803
st0: ASC=0x9 ASCQ=0x0
st0: Sense Key : 0x4 [current]
Info fld=0x28000
st0: ASC=0x9 ASCQ=0x0
st0: Sense Key : 0x3 [current]
Info fld=0x28000
st0: ASC=0xc ASCQ=0x0
st0: Sense Key : 0x4 [current]
Info fld=0x2912a
st0: ASC=0x9 ASCQ=0x0
st0: Sense Key : 0x4 [current]
Info fld=0x2318b
st0: ASC=0x9 ASCQ=0x0

http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm tells me these are "track following
errors".

Does that mean the drive is defective?

Pls share your thoughts ... I have to find a decision for that customer.

Thanks, Stefan

Post slightly OT: track following errors? 
On Monday, November 22, 2010 12:49:01 pm Stefan G. Weichinger did opine:

At first: Gene you seem to have used a different email-adress so your
reply didn't make it to the list.

Sorry bout that, I should change my sub, I'm getting tired of gmails
automatic nuking of my own posts.

I just quote it here:

Am 22.11.2010 12:09, schrieb gene heskett:
I gave up on the use of an earlier dat machine after wearing out half
a dozen of them. Life of the rotating head seems to be not much over
1000 hours, and while I am capable of replacing the heads myself, no
one would sell me the replacement head, claiming it took all sorts of
fancy machinery to do it right. So I wound up sending a $400 drive
to Oklahoma City every thanksgiving week, getting it back for about
$350 COD sometime after Christmas. Eventually I bought a big hard
drive and switched to virtual tapes, which have turned out to be many
times faster _AND_ far more dependable. Replaced once with no data
loss after smartd complained, the replacement is a full terrabyte and
spinning flawlessly 24/7. For me, the relatively much lower cost and
the dependability are a huge plus. Throw in that a recovery can be
done from that hard drive in 5 to 10% of the time it would take from
purely sequential tapes, and the choice is an absolute no brainer. I
have spent less than 20% of the money for hard drives that I would
have spent on dat drives and tapes in the nominally 5 years since I
switched.

For those that need off-site secure storage, just rotate the drive out
for another identically prepared one at the end of say every other
dumpcycle. Or, better yet IMNSHO, just ssh copy it over the net to
the off-site location, reducing the drives exposure to the knocks &
bumps of the real world. I have considered adding another drive to a
machine that runs my cnc milling machine just for that, on site, but
in another building, also on a huge ups, but the PATA interface on
that particular motherboard doesn't handle 2 drives per cable
properly. For running the milling machine, its not broke.

But that demo's how one might think about 'off-site' and its all
behind a router/NAT on the local, much more secure address block.

As for the head drum replacement scene, I have replaced around $80k or
more in dvc-pro broadcast videotape machines, they are about 1/5th
the size of a dat head drum, priced originally at $1500 ea, life 7 to
10k hours. I am a retired tv CE, and a C.E.T.

That, and a $1.33 will get you a big cuppa joe at 7-11. Wink

Advice is worth 2 cents, maybe.

More than 2, for sure Wink

Your hints regarding the rotating head sound good to me ... and it also
matches my experience with those devices.

Harddisk-based backups are no option there,

And why not, they are big enough for the job these days?

so I rather consider buying
an LTO drive as I think (and read and google) that those drives and the
used technology are more reliable ...

I can't argue with anything but the cost, of both the drives and the media,
something I can't begin to justify on my income as a retiree. However,
since the hard drive head flies on an air cushion, the wear rate when
spinning 24/7 is un-measureable, so only the start stop counts and the
spindle are the immediate factors barring particulate contamination of the
drive housing. Unless some new air injection technique to float the tape as
it passes over the heads in a tape drive has been developed, then the tape
still runs in close contact with the read/write head(s) and there will be a
wear factor involved. But I have NDI how the LTO drives approach and or
treat that problem.

The then legendary Ampex 600 audio tape machine from 50+ years ago solved
it by making their heads with gaps 30 thousandths deep, and figured on a
mils wear per thousand hours of tape motion. So they, with a recalibration
of the recording bias used at about 1000 hour intervals, could maintain
their performance for extended periods of time. Perhaps the LTO's are
using a similar idea, but with modern micro-controllers, are doing on a per
tape basis what it took me an hour or more to do in 1957? My best SWAG
anyway. Wink

I have an LTO2 here and some others (up to LTO4) at customers, good
performance so far.

Thanks, Stefan


--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Another megabytes the dust.

Post slightly OT: track following errors? 
At first: Gene you seem to have used a different email-adress so your
reply didn't make it to the list.

I just quote it here:

Am 22.11.2010 12:09, schrieb gene heskett:
I gave up on the use of an earlier dat machine after wearing out half a
dozen of them. Life of the rotating head seems to be not much over 1000
hours, and while I am capable of replacing the heads myself, no one would
sell me the replacement head, claiming it took all sorts of fancy machinery
to do it right. So I wound up sending a $400 drive to Oklahoma City every
thanksgiving week, getting it back for about $350 COD sometime after
Christmas. Eventually I bought a big hard drive and switched to virtual
tapes, which have turned out to be many times faster _AND_ far more
dependable. Replaced once with no data loss after smartd complained, the
replacement is a full terrabyte and spinning flawlessly 24/7. For me, the
relatively much lower cost and the dependability are a huge plus. Throw in
that a recovery can be done from that hard drive in 5 to 10% of the time it
would take from purely sequential tapes, and the choice is an absolute no
brainer. I have spent less than 20% of the money for hard drives that I
would have spent on dat drives and tapes in the nominally 5 years since I
switched.

For those that need off-site secure storage, just rotate the drive out for
another identically prepared one at the end of say every other dumpcycle.
Or, better yet IMNSHO, just ssh copy it over the net to the off-site
location, reducing the drives exposure to the knocks & bumps of the real
world. I have considered adding another drive to a machine that runs my
cnc milling machine just for that, on site, but in another building, also
on a huge ups, but the PATA interface on that particular motherboard
doesn't handle 2 drives per cable properly. For running the milling
machine, its not broke.

But that demo's how one might think about 'off-site' and its all behind a
router/NAT on the local, much more secure address block.

As for the head drum replacement scene, I have replaced around $80k or more
in dvc-pro broadcast videotape machines, they are about 1/5th the size of a
dat head drum, priced originally at $1500 ea, life 7 to 10k hours. I am a
retired tv CE, and a C.E.T.

That, and a $1.33 will get you a big cuppa joe at 7-11. Wink

Advice is worth 2 cents, maybe.

More than 2, for sure Wink

Your hints regarding the rotating head sound good to me ... and it also
matches my experience with those devices.

Harddisk-based backups are no option there, so I rather consider buying
an LTO drive as I think (and read and google) that those drives and the
used technology are more reliable ...

I have an LTO2 here and some others (up to LTO4) at customers, good
performance so far.

Thanks, Stefan

Post slightly OT: track following errors? 
Harddisk-based backups are no option there,

And why not, they are big enough for the job these days?

I just don't like that approach.
Drop a hdd and it's very likely damaged. Drop a tape and it's OK ...

I just prefer the parameters of a tape-based backup: number of
(physically separate) used volumes, price per volume (not per GB, ok),
reliability of media etc.

Maybe a personal preference, might be ... anyway.

A colleague tries to suggest RDX media : http://www.rdxstorage.com/

I don't know ... it would take some new schedule with amanda, thinking
up some mode of using vtapes with it ... but noone pays me for that (in
this case) so I tend to just swap the tape-drive.

so I rather consider buying
an LTO drive as I think (and read and google) that those drives and the
used technology are more reliable ...

I can't argue with anything but the cost, of both the drives and the media,
something I can't begin to justify on my income as a retiree.

The customer is a company, and earns enough money to spend those ~700
EUR ...

And additionally we solve the problem of too much data per tape with
DAT72 ... the LTO2 will bring us more capacity there.

However,
since the hard drive head flies on an air cushion, the wear rate when
spinning 24/7 is un-measureable, so only the start stop counts and the
spindle are the immediate factors barring particulate contamination of the
drive housing. Unless some new air injection technique to float the tape as
it passes over the heads in a tape drive has been developed, then the tape
still runs in close contact with the read/write head(s) and there will be a
wear factor involved. But I have NDI how the LTO drives approach and or
treat that problem.

I don't know the details but afaik LTO is much more reliable than DDS.

The then legendary Ampex 600 audio tape machine from 50+ years ago solved
it by making their heads with gaps 30 thousandths deep, and figured on a
mils wear per thousand hours of tape motion. So they, with a recalibration
of the recording bias used at about 1000 hour intervals, could maintain
their performance for extended periods of time. Perhaps the LTO's are
using a similar idea, but with modern micro-controllers, are doing on a per
tape basis what it took me an hour or more to do in 1957? My best SWAG
anyway. Wink

I don't know anything about Ampex as well Smile

Thanks for your feedback, Stefan

Post slightly OT: track following errors? 
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:46:56 +0100
"Stefan G. Weichinger" <sgw < at > amanda.org> wrote:

For those that need off-site secure storage, just rotate the drive
out for another identically prepared one at the end of say every
other dumpcycle.

Gene, I thought about this approach, and wasn't sure it would work.

* Amanda would assume it was only using one drive, so its metadata
wouldn't agree with either drive.

* Each drive would have every other dumpcycle, so you could find
yourself switching drive in the middle of a backup, and I suspect
neither Amanda nor the OS would like that.

My solution is a bit different: three drives, one of which stays put
and the other two of which rotate to the offsite location.

http://www.charlescurley.com/blog/articles/off_site_backups_for_amanda/index.html

And encrypt the files using ecryptfs.

--

Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB

Post slightly OT: track following errors? 
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:00:54 -0500
gene heskett <gheskett < at > wdtv.com> wrote:

Charles, I think your idea is even better, but does your offsite
drives have a pair of files per directory that are all the amanda
config and indice entries current to that days use of each vtape?

Thanks.

Not quite, but something similar. Each day I tarball the config files
and stuff them into a sister directory to the vtape directory. I use a
script like so:

#! /bin/bash

# Run the amanda dumps and back up key amanda data. Run this as the
# backup user.

config="DailySet1"

/usr/sbin/amdump ${config}

umask 0066
cd /
tar cjf /media/backs/amanda/back.var/var.lib.amanda.${config}.$(date
+\%a).tar.bz2 \ var/lib/amanda/ --exclude=*~
tar cjf /media/backs/amanda/back.etc/etc.amanda.${config}.$(date
+\%a).tar.bz2 \ etc/amanda/ --exclude=*~
tar cjf /media/backs/amanda/back.log/log.amanda.$(date +\%a).tar.bz2 \
var/log/amanda/ --exclude=*~

I think that gets everything. The naming scheme should work with
multiple configurations. It also ensures a week's worth of backups.

--

Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email

Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB

Display posts from previous:
Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
  


Magic SEO URL for phpBB