Reiserfs allocates inodes dynamically, so they're spread all over the
filesystem. So, doing a 'ls -l' in a directory causes major head-seeking.
Other filesystems, including XFS apparently, group inodes together on the
disk. I would assume this solves the problem at the expense of the
filesystem having a fixed number of inodes after creation.
I'm going to give xfs a shot. I'll post my results.
Out of curiosity: how much RAM do you have? Linux 2.2 kernels used
the box has 256M.
to have an inode-max setting. I'm not sure if it is completely
dynamic in 2.4+ or if there is some other way to control the
cache size.
and i presume you think it should be larger, not smaller, correct?
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf < at > foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 67.6 degrees)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation
Hackers Unite! GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event.
GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway
http://2004/guadec.org
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
