Backup Central

Hello,

I have several pools in one filestorage directory.
Bacula automatically labels new media as needed with the "LabelMedia = yes"
parameter.

Count Bacula usually labelled each pools media sequentially from 1 going
upwards in steps of one.

Now with my new setup version 5.0.1 he mixes up the pools, so that the next
number in any pool get to be the highest number of all the pools + 1.

Is this intended?
Are there any ways to turn this back to 'normal'?

--

Thanks

Steen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

WOW! You must not have upgraded in some time. I believe this change
came in 2008 or earlier..

I have several pools in one filestorage directory.
Bacula automatically labels new media as needed with the "LabelMedia = yes"
parameter.

Count Bacula usually labelled each pools media sequentially from 1 going
upwards in steps of one.

Now with my new setup version 5.0.1 he mixes up the pools, so that the next
number in any pool get to be the highest number of all the pools + 1.

Is this intended?

Yes. This was a bug fix to prevent duplicate ids being assigned in the
case that the user deleted some volumes.

Are there any ways to turn this back to 'normal'?

Not that I know of.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Torsdag den 11. Marts 2010 15:50:36 skrev John Drescher:
WOW! You must not have upgraded in some time. I believe this change
came in 2008 or earlier..

I have several pools in one filestorage directory.
Bacula automatically labels new media as needed with the "LabelMedia =
yes" parameter.

Count Bacula usually labelled each pools media sequentially from 1 going
upwards in steps of one.

Now with my new setup version 5.0.1 he mixes up the pools, so that the
next number in any pool get to be the highest number of all the pools +
1.

Is this intended?

Yes. This was a bug fix to prevent duplicate ids being assigned in the
case that the user deleted some volumes.

I understand that in terms of each pool, but I do not see that it would be
necessary to make that span the different pools with different label
templates?


--
Steen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Steen Meyer <blist < at > beckmeyer.dk> wrote:
Torsdag den 11. Marts 2010 15:50:36 skrev John Drescher:
WOW! You must not have upgraded in some time. I believe this change
came in 2008 or earlier..

I have several pools in one filestorage directory.
Bacula automatically labels new media as needed with the "LabelMedia =
yes" parameter.

Count Bacula usually labelled each pools media sequentially from 1 going
upwards in steps of one.

Now with my new setup version 5.0.1 he mixes up the pools, so that the
next number in any pool get to be the highest number of all the pools +
1.

Is this intended?

Yes. This was a bug fix to prevent duplicate ids being assigned in the
case that the user deleted some volumes.

I understand that in terms of each pool, but I do not see that it would be
necessary to make that span the different pools with different label
templates?


A volume can be moved from 1 pool to the other. Also different pools
do not have to have different label templates.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users < at > lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users