SearchFAQMemberlist Log in
Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
Get Message About Different Filesystem
Author Message
Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Mike
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Get-Message-About-Different-Filesystem-tf3915281.html#a11101478
Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
Mike Vasquez wrote:
I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Mike

Check out the onefs option in the manual:

http://bacula.org/rel-manual/FileSet_Resource.html

It explains what's going on, and how to change the behavior if you want.

--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
El mié, 13-06-2007 a las 08:04 -0700, Mike Vasquez escribió:
I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Mike

'Cause yours /home, /opt, /usr, /var, /stand... are mounted filesystems

Include them on the FileSet / Include directive

Best regards

D.

Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
Attachments: Message as HTML

At 10:04 AM 6/13/2007, Mike Vasquez wrote:

I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Sounds like a permissions issue. Check what user you are running it as,
and the perms on the file systems.

-Derek

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.

Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 10:11 -0500, Derek Ragona wrote:
At 10:04 AM 6/13/2007, Mike Vasquez wrote:

I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run
the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Sounds like a permissions issue. Check what user you are running it

It's Options OneFS. ~BAS

as, and the perms on the file systems.

-Derek

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users < at > li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki < at > co...>
Collaborative Fusion, Inc.

IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Wait a second, gang. While I do see some replies that may (or may not)
apply, I think there's something here that is more fundamental.

Mike, most U**x systems are split up into a number of different volumes.
This is done for a variety of reasons, both performance and security
related. One of the biggest reasons is that root is the *ONLY* user who
should have general write access to the top level volume. Yes, there may
be minor exceptions such as /etc/tnsnames.ora. One major reason for this
is that if the root filesystem fills up, unix systems tend to get very
unhappy and start screaming at the system administrators. To avoid these
problems, directories such as /var, /usr, /opt, etc. get their own
dedicated disk space. If /opt fills up, yes, it's a problem, but it won't
crash the box.

Now, back to the original question. Backup systems tend to really pay
attention to volume boundaries. This is exactly what Bacula is doing.
It's letting you know that /usr, /var, /stand, etc. are on different
volumes. /sbin and /etc are always part of the root volume, because
they're required for single user mode operation, where none of the other
volumes may be mounted or available. This really isn't an error, but it
is letting you know that you do need to address the situation by either
including these other mountpoints in include directives, or by using onefs
(as a couple of other folks have kindly pointed out.)

Jeff Kalchik

Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
That was it. I had to have a file= statement for all mounts mounts. Even
though it still gives you warning, if you have the mount pointed listed, you
are ok.

Mike

Frank Sweetser-2 wrote:

Mike Vasquez wrote:
I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Mike

Check out the onefs option in the manual:

http://bacula.org/rel-manual/FileSet_Resource.html

It explains what's going on, and how to change the behavior if you want.

--
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution
that
WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL
Mencken
GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users < at > li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Get-Message-About-Different-Filesystem-tf3915281.html#a11104559
Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Post Get Message About Different Filesystem 
Jeff Kalchik wrote:

I have compiled bacula-fd on an HP-UX machine. When I went to run the
director located on a Debian machine I get messages like "/home is a
different filesystem. Will not descend from / into /home"
I also get this message on /opt, /usr, /var, /stand.

It was able to descend into /sbin, /etc.

Any ideas as to why?

Wait a second, gang. While I do see some replies that may (or may not)
apply, I think there's something here that is more fundamental.

Mike, most U**x systems are split up into a number of different volumes.
This is done for a variety of reasons, both performance and security
related. One of the biggest reasons is that root is the *ONLY* user who
should have general write access to the top level volume. Yes, there may
be minor exceptions such as /etc/tnsnames.ora. One major reason for this
is that if the root filesystem fills up, unix systems tend to get very
unhappy and start screaming at the system administrators. To avoid these
problems, directories such as /var, /usr, /opt, etc. get their own
dedicated disk space. If /opt fills up, yes, it's a problem, but it won't
crash the box.

Now, back to the original question. Backup systems tend to really pay
attention to volume boundaries. This is exactly what Bacula is doing.
It's letting you know that /usr, /var, /stand, etc. are on different
volumes. /sbin and /etc are always part of the root volume, because
they're required for single user mode operation, where none of the other
volumes may be mounted or available. This really isn't an error, but it
is letting you know that you do need to address the situation by either
including these other mountpoints in include directives, or by using onefs
(as a couple of other folks have kindly pointed out.)

Jeff Kalchik

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users < at > li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



Jeff, you are correct, you must indicate all mounts points not just "/"
unless you specify onefs=yes. If you list all the mounts points you will
still get the message error, which is annoying, because you still list "/".
At least I do know that it is working now.

Thanks,

Mike
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Get-Message-About-Different-Filesystem-tf3915281.html#a11104703
Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Display posts from previous:
Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
  


Magic SEO URL for phpBB