
winbacula 2.0.3 signature alert
On Sunday 11 March 2007 17:08, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
Hello,
the signature file don't corrospond to the file:
$ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d
winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key
ID 10A792AD
gpg: BAD signature from "Bacula Distribution Verification Key
(www.bacula.org)"
$ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe --print-md md5
winbacula-2.0 .3.exe winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig
winbacula-2.0.3.exe: 0E D2 E6 6F 15 F5 9E 60 DC FB 0A 88 31 E2 71 7F
winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig: 57 71 4F 53 AE 02 6E BC 5F 5A 14 B8 42 29 6B 90
Check for modification please.
What's wrong?
We use public/private key cryptographic signatures rather than simple md5 hash
codes. It is much more secure.
Please read the "Latest News" from 2003 entitled "Distribution Verification"
and "Bacula Distribution Public Key" that on on the main Bacula page of
Source Forge.
Pierre Bernhardt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users < at > li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users