I had to have a tech manually clean the drive, and since then it has
been better (a different problem has now occured and one of the drives
may have to be replaced...
)
Turns out that when they flashed the firmware on the Vault, it reset the
autocleaning setting to No, and they didn't think to check....
-Brian
Dell, Mary wrote:
This is definitely a cleaning issue...and if you move a lot of tapes thru
your drives, even with regular cleaning you may have to replace the drives
from time to time.
This happens periodically with my jukeboxes, and I have the operators do an
extra cleaning and then relabel the affected tapes. Usually that clears it
up; if it doesn't I have the drive replaced. I have networker manage the
cleaning schedule - once every two weeks for low-use drives, once a week for
high-use (high use=writing all day as well as all night)
-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER < at > LISTSERV.TEMPLE.EDU] On
Behalf Of Brian O'Neill
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 6:31 AM
To: NETWORKER < at > LISTSERV.TEMPLE.EDU
Subject: Tapes getting marked as "full" when not used?
I've had a strange occurance the past two nights.
Networker 7.1.2 running on RedHat AS2.1, with a SAN-connected PowerVault
132T with two SDLT320 drives. Two Windows Servers as Dedicated Storage
Nodes and Dynamic Drive Sharing.
The past two nights, I've gotten the following message from one of the
storage nodes:
Mar 23 03:33:54 cranes logger: NetWorker media: (warning)
rd=winnode2:\\.\Tape1 opening: Warning: tape drive \\.\Tape1 requires
cleaning
Mar 23 03:34:34 cranes last message repeated 2 times
Mar 23 03:34:34 cranes last message repeated 2 times
Mar 23 03:34:34 cranes logger: NetWorker media: (info) write open error:
The device has indicated that cleaning is required before further
operations are attempted.
It then seems to go through every tape available and marks them all
"full" after mounting them. If I manually set them back to "appendable",
the backups continue without issue or errors.
The PowerVault is supposed to be managing its own cleaning...should I
change that to let Networker do it?
-Brian
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv < at > listserv.temple.edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
should be sent to stan < at > temple.edu
This communication may contain privileged and/or confidential
information. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing,
copying, distributing or using any of this information. If you received this
communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy
the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Confidential,
proprietary or time-sensitive communications should not be transmitted via
the Internet, as there can be no assurance of actual or timely delivery,
receipt and/or confidentiality. This is not an offer, or solicitation of any
offer to buy or sell any security, investment or other product.
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv < at > listserv.temple.edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
should be sent to stan < at > temple.edu
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv < at > listserv.temple.edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
should be sent to stan < at > temple.edu
