SearchFAQMemberlist Log in
Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
Antwort: Re: Sources of discrepancy between FILE volume siz
Author Message
Post Antwort: Re: Sources of discrepancy between FILE volume siz 
use a nonblocked pool
(you cannot change this setting - you'll need to move all data)

consider some disadvantages of nonblocked data, e.g. no autocopy with "blocked" pools...

Regards,
Alex




Von: "Allen S. Rout" <asr < at > UFL.EDU>
An: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Datum: 04.01.2012 15:04
Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] Sources of discrepancy between FILE volume size on disk and reported space?
Gesendet von: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>



On 01/04/2012 08:01 AM, Underdown,John William wrote:
i have the same issue with our document-imaging backups. this is due to
zillions of itty-bitty files being backed up, see below. btw, the
TXNGROUPMAX option only applies to files being backed up, not moved or
reclaimed. [...]

Sounds like this could very well be my problem. Thanks!

Shame I can't fix it for extant data. I might not be able to fix it at
all: if the content managment system sends just a page, or just a
packet of metadata, the txngroupmax will be irrelevant: transaction
size = 1. Razz


- Allen S. Rout

Post Antwort: Re: Sources of discrepancy between FILE volume siz 
Thanks Alex,

that works! it'll save me a TON of space!

is this a great forum or WHAT?!?!?!

On 01/04/2012 09:17 AM, Alexander Heindl wrote:
use a nonblocked pool
(you cannot change this setting - you'll need to move all data)

consider some disadvantages of nonblocked data, e.g. no autocopy with
"blocked" pools...

Regards,
Alex




Von: "Allen S. Rout" <asr < at > UFL.EDU>
An: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Datum: 04.01.2012 15:04
Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] Sources of discrepancy between FILE volume size on
disk and reported space?
Gesendet von: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
------------------------------------------------------------------------



On 01/04/2012 08:01 AM, Underdown,John William wrote:
i have the same issue with our document-imaging backups. this is due to
zillions of itty-bitty files being backed up, see below. btw, the
TXNGROUPMAX option only applies to files being backed up, not moved or
reclaimed. [...]

Sounds like this could very well be my problem. Thanks!

Shame I can't fix it for extant data. I might not be able to fix it at
all: if the content managment system sends just a page, or just a
packet of metadata, the txngroupmax will be irrelevant: transaction
size = 1. Razz


- Allen S. Rout



-----------------------------------------
NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the person or
entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential,
proprietary, and/or privileged material. Unless you are the
intended addressee, any review, reliance, dissemination,
distribution, copying or use whatsoever of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please reply
immediately and delete the material from all computers. Email sent
through the Internet is not secure. Do not use email to send us
confidential information such as credit card numbers, PIN numbers,
passwords, Social Security Numbers, Account numbers, or other
important and confidential information.

Post Antwort: Re: Sources of discrepancy between FILE volume siz 
On 01/04/2012 09:17 AM, Alexander Heindl wrote:
use a nonblocked pool
(you cannot change this setting - you'll need to move all data)

consider some disadvantages of nonblocked data, e.g. no autocopy with
"blocked" pools...


Could you hit that with a little more detail? When you say 'autocopy',
I think 'copystgpool=[yadda]'. But nonblock is specifically allowed for
copystgpool sources. I don't use copystgpool, but it's of interest
nonetheless.


- Allen S. Rout

Display posts from previous:
Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
  


Magic SEO URL for phpBB