Backup Central

Yes, I have tried it on an old test RS/6000. The installation went fine -
actually it was an upgrade from a 3.1 server. But after the install I
attempted to start the server and it bombed out complaining that only
AIX version 4.3 and above was supported. And worse yet, my 3.1 DB was
updated to the 3.7 format!

Thankfully it was just a test box.


--
Joshua S. Bassi
Senior Technical Consultant
Symatrix Technology, Inc.
jbassi < at > gloryworks.com

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Julie Bodley
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 7:28 PM
To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:


Hi all,

Has anyone tried putting Trivoli 3.7 on a AIX 4.1.5 box? Successful?

Julie
CelsiusTech Australia Pty Ltd

ADSM-L MAIL

Any one have any ideas, I cannot figure out what the problem could be.

MVS server code 3.1.2.5
Client code 3.1.0.6


ANR0484W Session 102 for node U-GIESJ2 (WinNT) terminated - protocol
violation
detected.

My guess is a bad password...


Frederic Landreville email: landrefl < at > yahoo.com
Lead Technical Analyst --- Yahoo Messenger Id: LANDREFL
J.T. International S.A. Geneva Branch
14, Chemin Rieu CH-1211 Geneva 17 Switzerland
Tel: +41-22-703-0323 Fax: +41-22-703-0324

"FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION. It comes bundled with the software."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gies, Joanne" <joanne.gies < at > CONNEXT.COM>
To: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Sent: 13 March, 2000 23:58


Any one have any ideas, I cannot figure out what the problem could be.

MVS server code 3.1.2.5
Client code 3.1.0.6


ANR0484W Session 102 for node U-GIESJ2 (WinNT) terminated - protocol
violation
detected.

I'm using a IBM 3570 (Magstar). It contains to tape drives with each 10
tapes. One drive is defined as a primary tape pool and the other one is a
copy tape pool.

I'm now looking at Archiving also and my question is, Can I devide my copy
tape pool into 2 pools. One copy pool and one Archive Tape pool?

Not sure I'm making myself clear here.

But in the end I would like to have,

1 primary tape pool, 10 tapes
1 copy tape pool 5 tapes, acting as a copy storage pool (tapes)
1copy tape pool 5 tapes, acting as a archive storige pool (tapes)

Anyone have any suggestions?

Thanx for Your time.
Henrik Hansson
Nomafa AB

Thanks. That helps fill in some of the blank spots as to what might be causing
our backups to run so slow.

One more thing, could you tell me what type of performance you are seeing from
your NT clients and what type of PCs/servers the NT clients are. The backup
performance on our NetFinity NT boxes is marginally better than it is for our
330 and 520 PC servers but still only comes to about 1.5 GB per hour.






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 04:21:43 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: Re: ADSM /400 performance?



100 Mbits, 3570 and 3590.
The network is NOT a limitation. I verified this several times.
The tape drive waits for the client. It is a poor performance if we compare
it with, for example, Unix servers. But AS/400 has a very particular
technology (I love it!). Storage pool in disk or in tape are not critical
factors neither.
Rafael.

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "MIKE HANLEY" <mhanley < at > NHBB.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:37 p.m.
Asunto: Re: ADSM /400 performance?


Rafael,

What type of network, AS/400, and drives are you using in your
environment?






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 03:46:13 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: ADSM /400 performance?



Approximately about 2,5 GB/hour backup before compression.
What about you?

Saludos / Regards / Au revoir

Rafael J. Goldschmidt -
Elcano 5039 (C1427CII)
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Telefonos: 54-11-4421 4782
Internet: rafagold < at > arnet.com.ar

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Don Schmeichel" <Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:05 p.m.
Asunto: ADSM /400 performance?


Those of you running ADSM Server on a AS/400, wondering what kind of
perfomance are you getting on your backups and restores per drive?

Thanks.


-Don
Don Schmeichel

Sr. San Integration Consultant
Phone: (612) 268-6631
E-mail: Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.com

NOw what ever performance you are seeing, there is a new option with TSM 3.7
of
resourceutilization [1-10]
exists under unix clients and I'd guess exists under NT clients even though
I haven't checked specifically YET.
This allows for multi-processes for backup activity... initial tests
earlier today showed this would yield a great increase in performance (ie a
major decrease in wall clock time for a scheduled incremental)
I'll be doing specific tests next week for more exact numbers over a single
thread incremental

later,
Dwight

----------
From: MIKE HANLEY[SMTP:mhanley < at > NHBB.COM]
Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 3:30 PM
To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU

Thanks. That helps fill in some of the blank spots as to what might be
causing
our backups to run so slow.

One more thing, could you tell me what type of performance you are seeing
from
your NT clients and what type of PCs/servers the NT clients are. The
backup
performance on our NetFinity NT boxes is marginally better than it is for
our
330 and 520 PC servers but still only comes to about 1.5 GB per hour.






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 04:21:43 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: Re: ADSM /400 performance?



100 Mbits, 3570 and 3590.
The network is NOT a limitation. I verified this several times.
The tape drive waits for the client. It is a poor performance if we
compare
it with, for example, Unix servers. But AS/400 has a very particular
technology (I love it!). Storage pool in disk or in tape are not critical
factors neither.
Rafael.

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "MIKE HANLEY" <mhanley < at > NHBB.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:37 p.m.
Asunto: Re: ADSM /400 performance?


Rafael,

What type of network, AS/400, and drives are you using in your
environment?






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 03:46:13
PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: ADSM /400 performance?



Approximately about 2,5 GB/hour backup before compression.
What about you?

Saludos / Regards / Au revoir

Rafael J. Goldschmidt -
Elcano 5039 (C1427CII)
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Telefonos: 54-11-4421 4782
Internet: rafagold < at > arnet.com.ar

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Don Schmeichel" <Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:05 p.m.
Asunto: ADSM /400 performance?


Those of you running ADSM Server on a AS/400, wondering what kind of
perfomance are you getting on your backups and restores per drive?

Thanks.


-Don
Don Schmeichel

Sr. San Integration Consultant
Phone: (612) 268-6631
E-mail: Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.com

Here's our statistics for one of the NT IBM 7000 servers:

objects inspected: 2,607,398
objects backed up: 7,118
objects updated: 3
objects rebound: 0
objects deleted: 2,157
objects failed: 269
bytes transferred: 806.08 MB
Data transfer time: 40.68 sec
Network data transfer rate: 20,286.74 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate: 22.55 KB/sec
Objects compressed by: 47%
Elapsed processing time: 10:09:55

Took 10 hours to back up 800MB! Maybe 1.5 GB an hour is not so bad...

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
MIKE HANLEY
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 4:31 PM
To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:


Thanks. That helps fill in some of the blank spots as to what might be
causing
our backups to run so slow.

One more thing, could you tell me what type of performance you are seeing
from
your NT clients and what type of PCs/servers the NT clients are. The backup
performance on our NetFinity NT boxes is marginally better than it is for
our
330 and 520 PC servers but still only comes to about 1.5 GB per hour.






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 04:21:43 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: Re: ADSM /400 performance?



100 Mbits, 3570 and 3590.
The network is NOT a limitation. I verified this several times.
The tape drive waits for the client. It is a poor performance if we compare
it with, for example, Unix servers. But AS/400 has a very particular
technology (I love it!). Storage pool in disk or in tape are not critical
factors neither.
Rafael.

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "MIKE HANLEY" <mhanley < at > NHBB.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:37 p.m.
Asunto: Re: ADSM /400 performance?


Rafael,

What type of network, AS/400, and drives are you using in your
environment?






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 03:46:13 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: ADSM /400 performance?



Approximately about 2,5 GB/hour backup before compression.
What about you?

Saludos / Regards / Au revoir

Rafael J. Goldschmidt -
Elcano 5039 (C1427CII)
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Telefonos: 54-11-4421 4782
Internet: rafagold < at > arnet.com.ar

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Don Schmeichel" <Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:05 p.m.
Asunto: ADSM /400 performance?


Those of you running ADSM Server on a AS/400, wondering what kind of
perfomance are you getting on your backups and restores per drive?

Thanks.


-Don
Don Schmeichel

Sr. San Integration Consultant
Phone: (612) 268-6631
E-mail: Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.com

Hi,

try to find your bottleneck out.
Our archive performance from NetFinity OS/2 clients
against NoName 2x350MHz NT PentiumII varies,
but is always a multiple of your numbers.
Incremental is different, surely,
you can even obtain througput of 0,0 MB/hour
if nothing changed.

regards
Juraj salak


-----Original Message-----
From: MIKE HANLEY [mailto:mhanley < at > NHBB.COM]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 10:31 PM
To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:


Thanks. That helps fill in some of the blank spots as to what might be
causing
our backups to run so slow.

One more thing, could you tell me what type of performance you are seeing
from
your NT clients and what type of PCs/servers the NT clients are. The backup
performance on our NetFinity NT boxes is marginally better than it is for
our
330 and 520 PC servers but still only comes to about 1.5 GB per hour.






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 04:21:43 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: Re: ADSM /400 performance?



100 Mbits, 3570 and 3590.
The network is NOT a limitation. I verified this several times.
The tape drive waits for the client. It is a poor performance if we compare
it with, for example, Unix servers. But AS/400 has a very particular
technology (I love it!). Storage pool in disk or in tape are not critical
factors neither.
Rafael.

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "MIKE HANLEY" <mhanley < at > NHBB.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:37 p.m.
Asunto: Re: ADSM /400 performance?


Rafael,

What type of network, AS/400, and drives are you using in your
environment?






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 03:46:13 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: ADSM /400 performance?



Approximately about 2,5 GB/hour backup before compression.
What about you?

Saludos / Regards / Au revoir

Rafael J. Goldschmidt -
Elcano 5039 (C1427CII)
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Telefonos: 54-11-4421 4782
Internet: rafagold < at > arnet.com.ar

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Don Schmeichel" <Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:05 p.m.
Asunto: ADSM /400 performance?


Those of you running ADSM Server on a AS/400, wondering what kind of
perfomance are you getting on your backups and restores per drive?

Thanks.


-Don
Don Schmeichel

Sr. San Integration Consultant
Phone: (612) 268-6631
E-mail: Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.com

Dmitri,

This is the results of our NetFinity NT server backing up to an AIX ADSM server.
Both connect via 100 Mbs ethernet. Disk system is shared RAID 5 (this is from a
cluster node).

Total number of objects inspected: 684,090
Total number of objects backed up: 3,228
Total number of bytes transferred: 903.88 MB
Data transfer time: 115.79 sec
Network data transfer rate: 7,993.25 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate: 66.95 KB/sec
Objects compressed by: 0%
Elapsed processing time: 03:50:24

If I read this right, the total session time was just under four hours for 903
MB, with a network transfer time of about two minutes. The rest of the time was
aggregating files?

This is with ADSM NT client 3.1.0.6.

Tab









Dmitri Ryutov <dmitri < at > RYUTOV.COM> on 03/23/2000 05:58:31 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: Tab Trepagnier/Corporation/Laitram/US)
Subject:




Here's our statistics for one of the NT IBM 7000 servers:

objects inspected: 2,607,398
objects backed up: 7,118
objects updated: 3
objects rebound: 0
objects deleted: 2,157
objects failed: 269
bytes transferred: 806.08 MB
Data transfer time: 40.68 sec
Network data transfer rate: 20,286.74 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate: 22.55 KB/sec
Objects compressed by: 47%
Elapsed processing time: 10:09:55

Took 10 hours to back up 800MB! Maybe 1.5 GB an hour is not so bad...

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
MIKE HANLEY
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 4:31 PM
To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:


Thanks. That helps fill in some of the blank spots as to what might be
causing
our backups to run so slow.

One more thing, could you tell me what type of performance you are seeing
from
your NT clients and what type of PCs/servers the NT clients are. The backup
performance on our NetFinity NT boxes is marginally better than it is for
our
330 and 520 PC servers but still only comes to about 1.5 GB per hour.






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 04:21:43 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: Re: ADSM /400 performance?



100 Mbits, 3570 and 3590.
The network is NOT a limitation. I verified this several times.
The tape drive waits for the client. It is a poor performance if we compare
it with, for example, Unix servers. But AS/400 has a very particular
technology (I love it!). Storage pool in disk or in tape are not critical
factors neither.
Rafael.

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "MIKE HANLEY" <mhanley < at > NHBB.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:37 p.m.
Asunto: Re: ADSM /400 performance?


Rafael,

What type of network, AS/400, and drives are you using in your
environment?






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 03:46:13 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: ADSM /400 performance?



Approximately about 2,5 GB/hour backup before compression.
What about you?

Saludos / Regards / Au revoir

Rafael J. Goldschmidt -
Elcano 5039 (C1427CII)
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Telefonos: 54-11-4421 4782
Internet: rafagold < at > arnet.com.ar

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Don Schmeichel" <Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:05 p.m.
Asunto: ADSM /400 performance?


Those of you running ADSM Server on a AS/400, wondering what kind of
perfomance are you getting on your backups and restores per drive?

Thanks.


-Don
Don Schmeichel

Sr. San Integration Consultant
Phone: (612) 268-6631
E-mail: Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.com

I've installed *SM 3.7 on an NT and the backup ran fine first night. The
next night it failed with the following error.

ANS1078S *** Unknown system error error-code; program ending ***

Explanation: An unknown and unexpected 933 occurred within the client
program. This is a programming failure and the client program ends.
System Action: Processing stopped.


***********

Does anyone know that this is?

Mehdi Amini
ValueOptions

Tnere is a patch for TSM on NT its 3.7.1.6 - get it from the IBM ftp site. We
had the same thing and it cleared up after installing the patch.

Regards,

Brian Johnson

Mehdi,

If you look in the error or scheduler log, you will find that files
are open or in use when backup was attempted on them. The most common I
have seen are "ntuser.dat', "ntuser.dat.log". Also look for file
specifications ending in "*." - there are files without extensions and with
multiple extensions. These are causing me fits with my client and I have
advised change this directive to "*".

Gary L. Ison
Governor's Office for Technology
101 Cold Harbor Drive
Frankfort, Ky. 40601
Phone: (502) 564-8724
Fax: (502) 564-6856
E-mail: Gary.Ison < at > mail.state.ky.us <mailto:Gary.Ison < at > mail.state.ky.us>

-----Original Message-----
From: Amini, Mehdi [SMTP:Mehdi.Amini < at > VALUEOPTIONS.COM]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 11:26 AM
To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:

I've installed *SM 3.7 on an NT and the backup ran fine first night. The
next night it failed with the following error.

ANS1078S *** Unknown system error error-code; program ending ***

Explanation: An unknown and unexpected 933 occurred within the client
program. This is a programming failure and the client program ends.
System Action: Processing stopped.


***********

Does anyone know that this is?

Mehdi Amini
ValueOptions

Did you test the below clients with compression turned off?




Dmitri Ryutov <dmitri < at > RYUTOV.COM> on 03/23/2000 06:58:31 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: Angelo DeAngelis/Tivoli Systems)
Subject:



Here's our statistics for one of the NT IBM 7000 servers:

objects inspected: 2,607,398
objects backed up: 7,118
objects updated: 3
objects rebound: 0
objects deleted: 2,157
objects failed: 269
bytes transferred: 806.08 MB
Data transfer time: 40.68 sec
Network data transfer rate: 20,286.74 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate: 22.55 KB/sec
Objects compressed by: 47%
Elapsed processing time: 10:09:55

Took 10 hours to back up 800MB! Maybe 1.5 GB an hour is not so bad...

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
MIKE HANLEY
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 4:31 PM
To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:


Thanks. That helps fill in some of the blank spots as to what might be
causing
our backups to run so slow.

One more thing, could you tell me what type of performance you are seeing
from
your NT clients and what type of PCs/servers the NT clients are. The backup
performance on our NetFinity NT boxes is marginally better than it is for
our
330 and 520 PC servers but still only comes to about 1.5 GB per hour.






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 04:21:43 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: Re: ADSM /400 performance?



100 Mbits, 3570 and 3590.
The network is NOT a limitation. I verified this several times.
The tape drive waits for the client. It is a poor performance if we compare
it with, for example, Unix servers. But AS/400 has a very particular
technology (I love it!). Storage pool in disk or in tape are not critical
factors neither.
Rafael.

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "MIKE HANLEY" <mhanley < at > NHBB.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:37 p.m.
Asunto: Re: ADSM /400 performance?


Rafael,

What type of network, AS/400, and drives are you using in your
environment?






"Rafael J. Goldschmidt" <rafagold < at > ARNET.COM.AR> on 03/23/2000 03:46:13 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>

To: ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU
cc: (bcc: MIKE HANLEY/NHBB/USA/MINEBEA)
Subject: ADSM /400 performance?



Approximately about 2,5 GB/hour backup before compression.
What about you?

Saludos / Regards / Au revoir

Rafael J. Goldschmidt -
Elcano 5039 (C1427CII)
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Telefonos: 54-11-4421 4782
Internet: rafagold < at > arnet.com.ar

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Don Schmeichel" <Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.COM>
Para: <ADSM-L < at > VM.MARIST.EDU>
Enviado: Jueves, 23 de Marzo de 2000 05:05 p.m.
Asunto: ADSM /400 performance?


Those of you running ADSM Server on a AS/400, wondering what kind of
perfomance are you getting on your backups and restores per drive?

Thanks.


-Don
Don Schmeichel

Sr. San Integration Consultant
Phone: (612) 268-6631
E-mail: Don_Schmeichel < at > CNT.com

I was wondering if anybody has a solution for this problem. We need to show
clients what files are backed up from an activity log in a non scheduled event.
We forced an incremental on a Unix box running Solaris 2.6 using the DSMC "I"
command. We can see in the foreground the files that are being copied (sent)
to ADSM. But we can't find a record of this process except in the activity log.
The activity log only shows stats. and no specific file movement. The nohup.out
file and the dsmcsched file does not show that particular activity. Does a
script need to be created to redirect the screen dump? And does anybody have
an example for a newbi Unix admin.