Q) Is rdiff backup being maintained ?
Thats sounds good, I too liked rdiff-backup, found some issues with it, worked around those and haven't really touched it in a while, but seeing as we are talking backups, always good to know that somebody is looking after the code.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Dominic Raferd <dominic < at > timedicer.co.uk ([email]dominic < at > timedicer.co.uk[/email])> wrote:
Alex, I believe Daniel Miller is working on a new project inspired by rdiff-backup, I think he will post here when it is ready for others to try. I don't think its archives will be compatible with rdiff-backup.
For most of us rdiff-backups works and works very well indeed. Users like myself would really appreciate some generous volunteer (who understands the code, unlike me!) creating and then maintaining a fork (which in due course could become rdiff-backup2?), so that ongoing bugs can be addressed. I'm not sure whether it would be best to start from 1.2.8 (stable), 1.3.3 (unstable, but I haven't heard of many problems) or CVS.
Dominic
http://www.timedicer.co.uk/
On 28/04/2011 01:33, Alexander Samad wrote:
Hi
Wondering if the application is being maintained - bug fixes etc
Alex
_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users < at > nongnu.org ([email]rdiff-backup-users < at > nongnu.org[/email])
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL:
http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
