Backup Central

Just a small enhancement request:
  
If I keep > 10 snapshots of the same kind the sorting gets messed up.
Thus I'd like to have a 0 padded numbering scheme like daily.01, daily.02,... daily.10 instead of daily.1, daily.10, daily.2 ...
Maybe this is already possible and I was just too stupid to find it although I searched quite a while.




---
E-Mail ist da wo du bist! Jetzt mit freenetMail ganz bequem auch unterwegs E-Mails verschicken.
Am besten gleich informieren unter http://mail.freenet.de/mobile-email/index.html

On 17 November 2011 11:39, <goldame < at > goldmail.de> wrote:
Just a small enhancement request:

Thus I'd like to have a 0 padded numbering scheme like daily.01,
daily.02,... daily.10 instead of daily.1, daily.10, daily.2 ...


I agree, although in my opinion sequence numbers should always be three
digits, e.g. 001, etc. Sometimes you exceed 100 (maybe not very likely
in this scenario) and then the same problem appears again, so it is much
better to just always consistently use three digits (in case you exceed
1000 then it is probably time to rethink naming strategy).

Using thee digits also makes the sequence number stand out very easily,
for instance in 2011-11-21.001 the sequence number clearly is a sequence
number not something else (year/month/day/hour etc).

BR Håkon Løvdal

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
rsnapshot-discuss mailing list
rsnapshot-discuss < at > lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rsnapshot-discuss